TorGuard VPN Speeds - What are you getting?

[naterhit 0]

2 minutes ago, 19807409 said:

You as a scientist must know that you can ask company behind speedtest.net to verfiy you those links above as those are not fake. Now, genius, once again, how can you verify if it is really my speed? I doubt you will get any other reply from the company than the one that the test was real.

Genius 😂do some work, where, once again, I proved to have the speed you reported with having real speedtest data where you fail to show anything and now since 48 posts try to impress somebody with some 😂 screenshots, amazing

 

I never said I was a scientist or claimed to be one - Again, please stop the lying son.

Post a screenshot of your speeds with a postit of your username, or post a simple youtube video.  Should take you 1 minute.  You are disputing my claim, burden of proof is on you son.

You are really making yourself look silly..

 

either a) you don't believe my speeds as you seem now or b) you don't care as earlier stated - Which is it?  I think you're confused which doesn't surprise me

[19807409 18]

genius, you dont get the sarcasm in calling you scientist 👨‍🔬, but you are right, my bad, after your laste 49 posts I should have assumed that you will not get it.

Lol, nah, will post you something better, how much faster is this then your super duper fastest 10Gbit based connection?:

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/9839818271

[naterhit 0]

3 minutes ago, 19807409 said:

genius, you dont get the sarcasm in calling you scientist 👨‍🔬, but you are right, my bad, after your laste 49 posts I should have assumed that you will not get it.

Lol, nah, will post you something better, how much faster is this then your super duper fastest 10Gbit based connection?:

http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/9839818271

 

Where I come from we hold the word scientist, for real scientists.

Trolling is against the forum rules - Please stop son

[19807409 18]

I am not trolling, I am actually trying to find out why do you promote bad products and try to impose yourself as super guru in endegaring users  by silly advices and claims women do not belong to this forum.

Back to networking, genius, how would somebody who has at least a little bit clue about networking know how to verify those tests or how one can perform some that other users can verify? Try it at least 😂, you already failed badly, so, there is no much deeper to go ⚫

[naterhit 0]

7 minutes ago, 19807409 said:

I am not trolling, I am actually trying to find out why do you promote bad products and try to impose yourself as super guru in endegaring users  by silly advices and claims women do not belong to this forum.

Back to networking, genius, how would somebody who has at least a little bit clue about networking know how to verify those tests or how one can perform some that other users can verify? Try it at least 😂, you already failed badly, so, there is no much deeper to go ⚫

I never said women do not belong to this forum - That is a lie - Please be careful son.

 

The only product I've recommended is their premium 10Gb network, which helps me get the fastest OpenVPN speeds of a sustained 840Mb/sec.

What bad product have I promoted?  You're saying their 10Gb network is a bad product?

 

I have not failed, I have offered to work with you every way I know possible by asking what you're looking for, asking if you've followed the guide, asked if you've tried this yourself, provided reference materials to support my claim, agreed to share info with you after you tried to be a punk and got school and backed out like a pussycat, to this.

So it's ok - you can avoid all the truth and facts you want my son, continue to live your in fairy-tale world

Is there anything else that I can help you out with, that you are willing to be serious about?

[19807409 18]

You claimed actually that shared servers are not good enough without any proof, by that denying the quality which torguard actually promised to its users and actually keeps it, despite users like you who claim it otherwise. Then you promote PREMIUM which actually is addon of the product shared servers which you claim not to be of promised quality, therefore one would assume you do promote bad product by saying to buy something which is not good just for capability to get a connection with a 10Gbit or higher backbone. You conradict yourself in statements and implicate actually that TorGuard lies and you are the only who knows it correctly.

TorGuards 10Gbit server are very good, but sadly for you, neither your ISP nor your interface offers you the ability to test its full speed, you are simply hyped by yourself. In short, you have no clue about TG's 10 Gbit servers which are every cent worth if you do require such server.

[naterhit 0]

1 minute ago, 19807409 said:

You claimed actually that shared servers are not good enough without any proof, by that denying the quality which torguard actually promised to its users and actually keeps it, despite users like you who claim it otherwise. Then you promote PREMIUM which actually is addon of the product shared servers which you claim not to be of promised quality, therefore one would assume you do promote bad product by saying to buy something which is not good just for capability to get a connection with a 10Gbit or higher backbone. You conradict yourself in statements and implicate actually that TorGuard lies and you are the only who knows it correctly.

TorGuards 10Gbit server are very good, but sadly for you, neither your ISP nor your interface offers you the ability to test its full speed, you are simply hyped by yourself. In short, you have no clue about TG's 10 Gbit servers which are every cent worth if you do require such server.

 

I didn't need to provide any proof to that claim, I was honest and up front in my original post with the specs.

I'm sorry if you could not comprehend them.  Had you actually read what I posted I said I could test the shared servers in a fews days when I had a chance to reconfig my router, which I still plan to do.  I did not deny, I said if you want the fastest service you need their 10Gb network, which is true.  TorGuard says it's true.  I don't need to prove that to you...

They are very good, I know I've posted my great speed.  Care to share your speeds with a screenshot of the TG Ip's as I have?

Is there anything else I can help you with son, that you are serious about?

[19807409 18]

You again lied in your first sentence of your reply in saying you were honest, I did not even bother to read the rest of your scratch of delusional reality.

You are a lier once again and once again you were incapable to reply any question and you spread lies about torguard and its products disrecpeting knowingly rules and ignoring multiple attempts pointing you to read rules as well terms and conditions of this ressource, probably better for TorGuard would be to simply cancel your subscription so you can go and waste some other providers ressources in teaching them your geniuses at work. I guess it would spare in costs more than to maintain all your lies you post here.

[naterhit 0]

3 minutes ago, 19807409 said:

You again lied in your first sentence of your reply in saying you were honest, I did not even bother to read the rest of your scratch of delusional reality.

You are a lier once again and once again you were incapable to reply any question and you spread lies about torguard and its products disrecpeting knowingly rules and ignoring multiple attempts pointing you to read rules as well terms and conditions of this ressource, probably better for TorGuard would be to simply cancel your subscription so you can go and waste some other providers ressources in teaching them your geniuses at work. I guess it would spare in costs more than to maintain all your lies you post here.

 

Son,

Let's recap - The very first two sentences of my very first reply to this entire thread said

Max sustained ISP speed without VPN ---->  940Mb/sec ~ 117MB/sec sustained

Max sustained speed WITH VPN through 10Gb network ---> 840Mb/sec ~ 105MB/sec sustained

So what part of "through 10Gb network" confused you?  I know you are still working on English.  I am not going to give up on you my friend.

 

Is there anything else I can help you with, that you are serious about?

[uNc 4]

9 hours ago, naterhit said:

 

Naive?  I'm posting screenshots with proof son.  I don't care what other speeds people get, I'm telling you what I am able to get with my setup.  I'm answering the post silly newb.  Are you claiming that I am not getting 840 Mb over OpenVPN?

I don't have a pfsense "appliance" - I built my own cheap to support near Gb real-time VPN speeds - Which I am getting.  Hopefully you understand the difference in the two.

Don't blame me if you don't know how to get fast speeds.  If you want 800+Mb VPN don't be a cheapo and instead pay the extra $.28 a day for 10Gb, and have a good Gb home connection and you won't have a problem.  I'm happy to educate you on my setup son if you want to learn how to get fast VPN speeds. 

I suggest you read this post --> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki/Gigabit_Networks_Linux and see they were able to get 885Mb...so keep spreading your newb nonsense that it's "not possible" to get over 250-300, or whatever nonsense you are spouting.  This is directly from OpenVPN, so I'm pretty sure they know how their protocol and speeds work.   There are thousands of results showing similar results.  Learn to google.  Or, you can just spout non-sense - Your call.

 

Using OpenSSL 1.0.0 with AES-NI capable hardware

The real performance gain is expected from the AES-NI capable hardware, such as the Intel Xeon X5660 and i5-560M CPUs. Using the exact same setup as above, but now using

  engine aesni

and by using

  ./openvpn --dev tun --proto udp --port 11000 --secret secret.key --ifconfig 192.168.222.11 192.168.222.10
    --tun-mtu 9000 --fragment 0 --mssfix 0 --cipher aes-256-cbc --engine aesni

for the server and

  ./openvpn --dev tun --proto udp --port 11000 --secret secret.key --ifconfig 192.168.222.10 192.168.222.11
    --tun-mtu 9000 --fragment 0 --mssfix 0  --cipher aes-256-cbc --engine aesni --remote server

for the client we obtain the following results (all speeds in Mbps):

	AES128	AES256
X5660 -> i5-560	885	878
i5-560 -> X5660	748	543

 

 

 

Again - You claim non-sense.  I post proof and offer help to get you fast, yet you just want to be a newb.  Enjoy your slow speeds son

 

 

Seems like your just mad you got schooled and don't know what to do other than refute facts - 

So son, I post proof and screenshots - You say it's not possible?  Who is telling the truth?  Hint:  It's not you..

So I've made my claim with proof - If you want to dispute it, keep your questions there and I'm happy to help.  I've stated my claim and proof, now if you want to dispute please educate me to where I am wrong.   If you want to assume that because a couple people on the forums were not able to get that fast does not mean it's not possible.  What is making you so upset?  The fact that I'm what I'm showing isn't what other members have been able to get?  Have you tried any of this stuff yourself? 

Have a blessed day my friend and let me know if you want some education on how to get the fast speeds you want.

this is more like it

:https://www.wireguard.com/performance/#results

As mentioned, your data IS NOT going thru the tunnel if >800Mbps

Something is not configured properly, maybe cli speedtest is bypassing the tunnel.

[19807409 18]

you keep trashing this thread, known as spamming.

it is ok, we all believe you get those numbers but nobody bothers to care about it or about your setup as you lack on knowledge to even explain it. You are incapable until now of doing anything, just lies and breaking rules. You forgot some screenshot with a bluehorn or so

[naterhit 0]

14 minutes ago, uNc said:

this is more like it

:https://www.wireguard.com/performance/#results

As mentioned, your data IS NOT going thru the tunnel if >800Mbps

Something is not configured properly, maybe cli speedtest is bypassing the tunnel.

 

Absolutely happy to work with you on this.  Would you like a couple screenshots showing pfsense OpenVpn config or what?  Pfsense has the entire tunnel encrypted, trust me it is - I spent a few days tweaking it from high 700's, to low 800's, to 840 max 

My homebox has a Chelsio dual 10Gb port card...1Gb is nothing...Would love to help show this, what would you like?

 

Let me go take a quick snapshot downstairs, and post - be right back

[naterhit 0]

10 minutes ago, 19807409 said:

you keep trashing this thread, known as spamming.

it is ok, we all believe you get those numbers but nobody bothers to care about it or about your setup as you lack on knowledge to even explain it. You are incapable until now of doing anything, just lies and breaking rules. You forgot some screenshot with a bluehorn or so

 

There was no question in there, so it seems as if there is nothing more I can do to help you my friend - Good luck son

Have a blessed day

[uNc 4]

https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/fz0u9n/hardware_requirements_for_500500_openvpn/

 

[uNc 4]

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/103216/pfsense-hardware-for-home-router-openvpn-performance/2

[naterhit 0]

3 minutes ago, uNc said:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/fz0u9n/hardware_requirements_for_500500_openvpn/

 

 

What about the thread I'm sorry ?  

[naterhit 0]

4 minutes ago, uNc said:

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/103216/pfsense-hardware-for-home-router-openvpn-performance/2

 

those posts are from 2016-2018 

I've optimized quite a bit too.  Again happy to show anything you want, what would you like.  Here's quick pic I took downstairs, it ain't much.  Router is $50 amd proc with dual port 10Gb chelsio card, to a 16 port 10Gb SFP+ switch.  There's about 1PB of storage there and a few 1u's for VM's.

 

[uNc 4]

https://www.firewallhardware.it/en/openvpn-and-pfsense-opnsense-optimization-of-encryption-and-traffic-compression-to-optimize-hardware-and-improve-security/

[naterhit 0]

11 minutes ago, uNc said:

https://www.firewallhardware.it/en/openvpn-and-pfsense-opnsense-optimization-of-encryption-and-traffic-compression-to-optimize-hardware-and-improve-security/

 

THose results are from an atom processor --> CPU C2758

 

Also none of those results have gcm cipher results, which is what I'm using..cbc old and inefficient, I wouldn't recommend it

Yes, you may NOT get great speeds running pfsense on an atom processor with older inefficient cbc, I totally agree with you there.  I have a computer as my router.

Happy to help, let me know

 

Happy to show setup/config whatever you want.

Actually, you know what?  Now that I think about it, those results were all through VM's.  I wonder if I could test it bare-metal, it may be even faster!

[uNc 4]

https://www.firewallhardware.it/en/firewall-hardware-sizing-guide/

 

[uNc 4]

https://www.firewallhardware.it/en/firewall-hardware-sizing-guide/

[naterhit 0]

1 hour ago, uNc said:

https://www.firewallhardware.it/en/firewall-hardware-sizing-guide/

 

THose results were all obtained (*) These measurements were made using the compression hardware module.

Also not really recent, over a year old also.

I'm not really sure what your intention is by showing all the various links and stuff, but we're not even looking at the same stuff here.  If you would like some assistance in getting it working or want some of my proof let me know.  All those links were comparing apples to oranges.  Yep both fruit, but we're not talking the same lingo I think my friend.  Hope to hear soon.

 

My speeds are 940Mb/sec off VPN, 840Mb/sec on VPN max sustained speeds using TG VPN using OpenSSL using their 10Gb premium network on a dedicated pfsense box with a cheap aes-ni processor with a dual port 10Gb NIC.  ( For me, it's worth the extra 26.6 cents per day for the extra speed their premium network can give me consistently 840 ), but to each their own I suppose.  For folks who do not need the fastest speeds that their premium offers of a service, there is the regular shared service too.  Nothing wrong with either, just personal preference.

 

Some folks prefer sub-compact cars, some folks prefer low-cost options, some folks prefer sports cars and guns and freedom.  The point is there are options for us now for high speed, 5 min solutions, while WireShark matures a bit.
2019

Happy to help, let me know friend.

Have a blessed day!

[uNc 4]

1 hour ago, naterhit said:

 

those posts are from 2016-2018 

I've optimized quite a bit too.  Again happy to show anything you want, what would you like.  Here's quick pic I took downstairs, it ain't much.  Router is $50 amd proc with dual port 10Gb chelsio card, to a 16 port 10Gb SFP+ switch.  There's about 1PB of storage there and a few 1u's for VM's.

 

Nice, still in your mama's basement, good...STAY there. And ask your mommy for a table and chair....LOL

[naterhit 0]

40 minutes ago, uNc said:

Nice, still in your mama's basement, good...STAY there. And ask your mommy for a table and chair....LOL

 

negative, in the almost $400,000 4 bedroom 4.5 bath home that I own son - Karma is awesome!

The storage alone sitting there is probably close to $15,000-$25,000 son.

 

Ok folks - we're up to two trolls with unc and 19807409, probably the same person it appears

Have a blessed day son.  I had such high hopes for you too, ahhhh well..millennials, what are you going to do with em  

 

Young adults - Please do not be like this, for the love of $deity.  This is what happens when calm rational logic and facts are met with spoiled brats, in the end, always.  Same with politics.  You've made an excellent example, thank you sir/mam.  They always peter out and admit defeat with insults, it's ok.  It's a tough war but I will continue fighting it  

 

Ok folks - let's try this again - If you're just seeing this you can pretty much skip the entire thread from page 1 until the last few posts, you're not missing much except for a couple rookie failed trolling attempts - DENIED!

 

My speeds are 940Mb/sec off VPN, 840Mb/sec on VPN max sustained speeds using TG VPN using OpenSSL using their 10Gb premium network on a dedicated pfsense box with a cheap aes-ni processor with a dual port 10Gb NIC.  ( For me, it's worth the extra 26.6 cents per day for the extra speed their premium network can give me consistently 840 ), but to each their own I suppose.  For folks who do not need the fastest speeds that their premium offers as a service, there is the regular shared service too.  Nothing wrong with either, just personal preference.  If you would like assistance just reach out please.  Also do not believe the bs that it's impossible to get faster than 250, or 300 or whatever other nonsense they spout.

[19807409 18]

@Support I do guess administration simply does not care. Just wait until you start seeing here some nude porn pics. I guess you have to rewrite rules or to hold on those you've set. I got already that you might not care at all about forum as today to run a forum is kinda obsolete, you allow all kind of retards to waste time here. However, it is always good to know about forums where administration is passive or inactive, as that can be later used for whatever agenda one might have. Probably you should advice your customers not to go to this forum as it seems nobody does maintenance here.

@naterhit your mum is already sorry that you've been born, she can't go walk with you as you are not normal, if you do not take drugs or strong medicine, consider doing it. Does your daddy know that you exist? Hope he at least knows you exist, but seems to have given up on you, even beating does not help retards like you