a-b Posted April 1, 2018 Report Share Posted April 1, 2018 Cloudflare lunched privacy first DNS 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 You can find out more https://1.1.1.1 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16727869 I would love to hear thoughts on how are they comparing to TorGuard DNS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Support Posted April 2, 2018 Report Share Posted April 2, 2018 Hello, They look promising - i can't tell you how they compare until we do some testing. Regards 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerkPork Posted August 3, 2021 Report Share Posted August 3, 2021 Were there ever any test results for performance between 1.1.1.1 and Torguard Public DNS? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sav3d Posted August 12, 2021 Report Share Posted August 12, 2021 On 8/3/2021 at 12:41 PM, JerkPork said: Were there ever any test results for performance between 1.1.1.1 and Torguard Public DNS? Hoping to get an answer from this too, I am using 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19807409 Posted August 12, 2021 Report Share Posted August 12, 2021 You could test it and check which one works for you best, here you can see benchmarks by namebench as well as I attached the results file in the attachment. Beside namebench, you could also run DNS nameserver benchmark, dns jumper, CDFPerf, DNSPerf to find out more. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jberry Posted August 23, 2021 Report Share Posted August 23, 2021 On 8/12/2021 at 10:56 PM, 19807409 said: You could test it and check which one works for you best, here you can see benchmarks by namebench as well as I attached the results file in the attachment. Beside namebench, you could also run DNS nameserver benchmark, dns jumper, CDFPerf, DNSPerf to find out more. Thank you for sharing your benchmark tests! I always used 1.1.1.1 but now trying the 10.8.0.1 Torguard internal DNS, web browsing seems to be very fast! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19807409 Posted August 24, 2021 Report Share Posted August 24, 2021 10 hours ago, jberry said: Thank you for sharing your benchmark tests! I always used 1.1.1.1 but now trying the 10.8.0.1 Torguard internal DNS, web browsing seems to be very fast! You are welcome. Some info just as note: primary dns: 10.9.0.1 secondary dns: 10.8.0.1 Maybe it is also good to know that you can use those as socks/http/https proxy. Few days ago when I tested something, only default http port worked (6060), https and socks do not work for now with default ports, if they do at all, then at some other ports, best is if you ask support about which ports are used on internal server. http proxy: 10.9.0.1:6060 and 10.8.0.1:6060 (be aware that this proxy will only work when you are connected to vpn). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainbleach Posted August 31, 2021 Report Share Posted August 31, 2021 Does TorGuard public DNS allow DNS over TLS though? I'm currently using cloudflare DNS for when i'm not connected via vpn using DNS over TLS feature with my router. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19807409 Posted August 31, 2021 Report Share Posted August 31, 2021 1 hour ago, Brainbleach said: Does TorGuard public DNS allow DNS over TLS though? I'm currently using cloudflare DNS for when i'm not connected via vpn using DNS over TLS feature with my router. So far I know, none of TorGuard's DNS servers support it, but if ever enabled, you will be able to test it, in the link above provided benchmarking dns servers you clearly can see: dnseval --dnssec -t A --tls --color -f public-servers.txt -c10 ripe.net server avg(ms) min(ms) max(ms) stddev(ms) lost(%) ttl flags response ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.8.0.1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 %100 N/A -- -- -- -- -- -- -- No Response 10.9.0.1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 %100 N/A -- -- -- -- -- -- -- No Response 1.0.0.1 155.279 147.358 170.329 7.124 %0 296 QR -- -- RD RA AD -- NOERROR 1.1.1.1 187.067 146.294 236.867 36.326 %0 293 QR -- -- RD RA AD -- NOERROR I did not test all torguard's servers, assume none of them supports TLS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.