Jump to content
TorGuard

Leaderboard

  1. Support

    Support

    Administrators


    • Points

      56

    • Content Count

      2,451


  2. MadKow

    MadKow

    Members


    • Points

      4

    • Content Count

      1


  3. uNc

    uNc

    Members


    • Points

      3

    • Content Count

      97


  4. Stung

    Stung

    Members


    • Points

      2

    • Content Count

      7



Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 08/15/2019 in Posts

  1. 7 points
    Hello everyone, We seem to be receiving more and more questions about WireGuard recently due to the extreme difference in speeds over other protocols, our developers are working hard on integrating into our Desktop apps at first and then mobile apps thereafter - our WireGuard integration will support Dedicated IP's, Port forwards, Streaming/Residential IP's and support ALL locations. We know everyone is hoping for a design update, there will be some small changes soon but not drastic, we really don't want to change things drastically, our functionality and app flow/security is more important, the app flow will change but again not drastically, remember it's not about how one looks, it's what's inside 😉 Best Regards TorGuard
  2. 4 points
    Release torguard-v4.0.1, 2020-08-10 ==================================== - All platforms: Add support for WireGuard - All platforms: Disable legacy Internet (Interface) Kill Switch - MacOSX: Add Firewall restrictions Downloads P.S. Dedicated IP/Streaming IP support will come very soon.
  3. 4 points
    I have successfully used wireguard to connect to the "wireguard" servers listed in the support page; however, I am looking to connect via wireguard to one of the dedicated IP servers I have on my account. Is anyone aware if this is available now and, if so, how to set it up, or if there is any timeline on when it will be available?
  4. 3 points
    Hello, As everyone knows of the Kaspersky issue by now, the following steps will resolve the problem it seems until they fix there end: 1. Disable Kaspersky product’s self-defense: https://support.kaspersky.com/14818 2. Open regedit (press Windows+R keys, type regedit and click OK, see https://support.kaspersky.com/common/diagnostics/8576#block2). 3. Go to [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\kneps] key and create new DWORD parameter NoDefrag with value 1 (or just run kneps_no_dfg.reg file from attached archive). 4. Enable Kaspersky product’s self-defense back. 5. Restart PC in order to apply changes. 6. Run TorGuard application, establish VPN connection and check if the problem is reproduced. Please let us know if this works for you with no issues. kneps_no_dfg.zip If you are unable to download the attachment please use the following link: https://mail.privatemail.com/?/files-pub/PwnHuFmDrS/list EDIT: Kaspersky have notified us that a fix will be coming on there end in there October release.
  5. 3 points
    Release torguard-v3.99.3, 2020-07-09 ==================================== - All platforms: Fix a potential crash upon disconnect when ShadowSock is used. - All platforms: new option "Refresh server list" in "Settings->General" - Windows: Fix TAP driver installation from TorGuard Client * Next release will be the WireGuard release, its 90% done. Downloads
  6. 2 points
    They are very limited and many users use them so speeds will take a hit - once implemented inside our TG app all servers will support WireGuard. Regards
  7. 2 points
    I work in IT so one thing I have learned is once you promise a time saying it will be done by, something always goes wrong and it takes twice as long as you thought it would. The new update you guys are working on is a big improvement/change and I think the users are excited to see it and use it. I know I am.
  8. 1 point
    I've asked this question multiple times, and I have yet to get a useful answer. So again: When will configuration files for routers be available, and where? I'll reserve my thanks until I get a useful answer. This is getting old...
  9. 1 point
    Attention support: Yes, please advise when the wireguard conf files can be downloaded for manual configuration as noted by Code in the post above. Regards.
  10. 1 point
    It keep counting number of connected times, need to be fix asap Plus the interface keep disappear after disconnect, not good
  11. 1 point
    I can confirm, will have fixed tomorrow - thanks
  12. 1 point
    I have a 500/500Mbps fiber service in Thailand and speed is about 700Mbps w/o VPN and about 600Mbps with Wireguard Singapore server using macOS TG app, tested via the cli, over CAT6 ethernet.
  13. 1 point
    Try restore defaults under the general tab, this should resolve your issue.
  14. 1 point
    No serious issues, just server side niggles with our implementation, we are working on that now, it takes a wee bit when there are thousands of servers. We won’t be too long before we send out some Beta's. Regards
  15. 1 point
    We are well aware guys and we resolve these issues with our implementation - this is part of the reason things are a little delayed but just to let you know: 1) All servers now support WireGuard but only from the TG client implementation - so the whole network is now ready. 2) We have WireGuard running inside TG just fine, we are just working out some small issues as we need to have it working with all the features we provide including dedicated IP's. 3) Its very fast indeed! Regards
  16. 1 point
    Yes, this is possible!
  17. 1 point
    On the sales page:https://torguard.net/anonymoustorrentvpn.php, Torguard states that "x8 Simultaneous Connections". It means you should be able to use the VPN service on 8 devices at the same time.
  18. 1 point
  19. 1 point
    We will place a notification in your client area once we have them available. Regards
  20. 1 point
    We hope a beta will be out this week - we have hit some bumps but getting there. I promise we will
  21. 1 point
    James that worked perfectly! Thank you once again, for all the help and patience. My issue was that, I was copying the wrong private key, I copied it from Wireguard on Mac not realising that the particular key was a result of my private key and the private key. Anyways it work well! Much appreciated
  22. 1 point
    It's coming, don't worry about that We are just making sure its ready for production release, the last thing we want to do is push it without the appropriate testing.
  23. 1 point
    Here is what I have done and it works for me, Settings - Additional - config extension rules and Specify trusted applications and add torguarddesktopQT.ex best of luck
  24. 1 point
    It's not far away guys, we have a release pushing today with all internal work about done, we are nearly there! Regards
  25. 1 point
    Any update as to this? It's been over 2 weeks. I'm in the same boat. I'm getting connection refused for a few IPs that proxy.torguard.org is resolving to. I've been a loyal customer of torguard for 6 years now.. really would like to keep using their service. Note: I've opened an actual support ticket on this. Update: I wrote a bash script (for linux) that parses the IPs for the proxy hostnames, and returns their location. This is current as of a few minutes ago: 1/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 173.254.222.146 2/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 173.254.222.154 3/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 173.254.222.162 4/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 173.254.222.170 5/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 173.254.222.178 6/68 "Miami","United States" 173.44.37.106 7/68 "Miami","United States" 173.44.37.114 8/68 "Miami","United States" 173.44.37.82 9/68 "Miami","United States" 173.44.37.90 10/68 "Miami","United States" 173.44.37.98 11/68 "Amsterdam","Netherlands" 185.156.172.154 12/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.194 13/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.202 14/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.210 15/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.218 16/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.226 17/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.234 18/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.242 19/68 null,"Germany" 194.59.250.250 20/68 null,"Romania" 37.120.141.114 21/68 null,"Romania" 37.120.141.122 22/68 null,"Romania" 37.120.153.234 23/68 null,"Romania" 37.120.153.242 24/68 null,"Netherlands" 46.23.78.24 25/68 null,"Netherlands" 46.23.78.25 26/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.10 27/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.102 28/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.14 29/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.18 30/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.22 31/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.26 32/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.30 33/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.34 34/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.38 35/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.42 36/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.46 37/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.50 38/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.54 39/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.58 40/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.6 41/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.62 42/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.66 43/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.70 44/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.78 45/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.82 46/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.90 47/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.94 48/68 "Beverly Hills","United States" 68.71.244.98 49/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.230 50/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.231 51/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.232 52/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.233 53/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.234 54/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.235 55/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.237 56/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.238 57/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.239 58/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.240 59/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.241 60/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.242 61/68 null,"United Kingdom" 88.202.177.243 62/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.144.114 63/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.144.122 64/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.147.106 65/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.147.42 66/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.148.66 67/68 "Dallas","United States" 96.44.189.114 68/68 "Los Angeles","United States" 98.143.158.50
  26. 1 point
  27. 1 point
    It was 2 hours and 10 minutes. If it was 2 hours and 11 minutes you get 100% back refunded plus a new Alienware laptop....damm...I need a new laptop.
  28. 1 point
  29. 1 point
    I would say this is also a first for me as well.
  30. 1 point
    Yeah it's odd they don't give you a message to update, that's a security risk for users running old software.
  31. 1 point
    @Support Diito from me. Any update? Or is there a way to configure the linux supplicant natively. I only connect to my dedicated IPs, so I'd happily do without the TGClient
  32. 1 point
  33. 1 point
  34. 1 point
    Mine is also down, just died in the middle of using it about 5:45pm MDT. Ticket filed, couple of responses, no resolution yet.
  35. 1 point
    Hi, isn't it good idea to have Server status page like Windscirbe has on https://windscribe.com/status I thought maybe it might be good idea to have that for the users whom might like to look at such info. Thanks.
  36. 1 point
    This is in next version
  37. 1 point
  38. 1 point
    I've used the ticket system through the client area many times, they're usually pretty responsive even on weekends. I've used OpenVPN UDP and TCP TorGuard for a year with no problems on my Win 10 PC. Lenovo machines are renowned for shipping with bloatware, and your issue doesn't sound like a TG problem, it sounds like either a TUN adapter conflict or issue, or possibly a firewall/AV issue. What antivirus/security software are you using? What other troubleshooting have you done on your side? Ran pings or done traceroutes when you lose connectivity to see if the traffic is stopping anywhere in particular? Checked for conflicting software? Tried TCP instead of UDP? (TCP does some TCP-in-TCP 'magic' to avoid issues like packet fragmentation, despite it being less efficient on a totally optimised connection). The VPN connection grinding slowly to a halt is indicative of a problem with your PC (software or drivers) or your connection, not necessarily the TG server. I use various TG servers in the UK and US, all of which perform reliably. Slightly slower at peak time if you're hammering a download or upload, but still plenty fast (always over 100 mbit/sec). How does it perform if you run over a wired link? If fine, that points to wifi chipset or driver problems. Have you booted the machine from a Linux live USB or live CD and set up a VPN connection in Linux to test? That's a harmless way of doing a useful comparison on the same hardware without having to set up dualboot. Also, have you tried other VPN providers? They all use the same underlying approach (build aspects of the OpenVPN client into their own apps and wrap that with their own interface) and so they almost all use the same kind of TUN adapters controlled in the same way. If you're having problems with one provider, you'll quite possibly have problems with all of them. Have you done a clean uninstall of the TorGuard app and then reinstalled the latest version? Have you tried installing with the older version of the TUN adapter? I'd also try OpenConnect and/or Wireguard, both of which are available to you either through the TG client app or by installing a WireGuard client on your PC and following some instructions online (not too tough, and the TG site gives you the crypto details you need to put in on your client).
  39. 1 point
    Its scheduled to go into one of the next 2 releases
  40. 1 point
    Try https://updates.torguard.biz/Software/Linux/torguard-v3.96.1-amd64.deb
  41. 1 point
    We are working on it Amir - this won't be a whole complete design change, it will be be a more modern and smoother look though, a bit like our new Android UI. Regards
  42. 1 point
    Hello everyone We hadn't seen this thread, we do not believe in a warrant canary here at TG - there are no logs on any TG servers, we have started migrating to volatile RAM-based servers but in any case your data does not hit our HD's in the first place, this migration, of course, will take some time but we have started the process - there is no identifying info that can be collected, regardless of the amount of force applied with TG. Regards
  43. 1 point
    Check out this TG openVPN install guide on an Asus with Merlin: https://x3mtek.com/torguard-openvpn-2-4-client-setup-for-asuswrt-merlin-firmware/
  44. 1 point
    There is no eta at the minute but i can assure you they are working on it. Regards
  45. 1 point
    My Guess is Atlanta is a Cogent Service, I once Streamed IPTV from a Seller that used Cogent Network because they are cheap but it wasn't very reliable.
  46. 1 point
    You need to re run the installer, choose reinstall TAP adapter, choose 9.9. I'm not sure what versions are offered now, but yeah, choose the older one. TORGUARD PLEASE PUT A NOTE IN YOUR PROGRAM TO TRY 9.9 etc IF THERE ARE ISSUES.
  47. 1 point
  48. 1 point
    I have been using Torguard now for 2-3 years and it has been working Flawlessly. I use it every single day and I i NEVER experience any significant problems. You are likely Configuring something wrong, if it is not working then you have configured it wrong, i say that because i use socks5 proxy and VPN everyday flawlessly without any problems for years. The forums is not the fastest way to ask for help, if you need support or help configuring something i would suggest going through the proper channels of opening a support ticket or talking to live chat and i am sure they will assist you ASAP! I have gone into live chat a few times over the years for general questions and they always reply to me Very quickly and Professionally. Torguard is a very Professionally run VPN service with good stability/security and the support has always been top notch in my opinion. I have tested other vpn services and Torguard surely rates at the Top. It is a No logs VPN service so 5 eyes? Nothing is logged so no information can be given if asked therefore 5 eyes is of no real concern. 5 eyes can ask for something yes but with No logs they will receive no info so there is no concern. I would suggest asking your question By opening a support ticket or going through live chat.
  49. 1 point
    Interim further testing indicates you need to connect to your chosen VPN server on port 1912 for port forwarding to work - despite being able to choose from all connecting ports (1194, 1195 etc) for establishing your VPN on the port forwarding setup form. Obviously you can choose any unused port to forward. Don't forget you'll likely need to forward the same port as both TCP and UDP for torrenting.
  50. 1 point
    Hi - currently we have no API but this is currently being worked on and will allow you to control the app via the command line which should help in your situation. Regards
×
×
  • Create New...